- #Cubase 9 pro password macwins upgrade#
- #Cubase 9 pro password macwins mac#
- #Cubase 9 pro password macwins windows#
when I have run it, it seems to operate fine and smooth and has all the features you would expect. I think the current Cubase10 is WAY more ok on Mac, then the old SX days. I might try to do some projects with it at some point, but so far I haven't and in particular the VEP performance with it sucks. I bought it on cross grade last year, not even on sale because the curiosity got the best of me and I always wanted to know what all the fuss was about. if you plan to use VEP, then I would not recommend Cubase on a mac.īut, Cubase might not be the culprit and might perform adequately without VEP. what we know is that Cubase+VEP is currently a CPU pig.
DP is using the Mas version of the VEP plugin. I have also tested the same project with DP+VEP and found it to consume somewhere halfway between Logic and Cubase with VEP in terms of CPU usage. Logic is using the AU version of their Plugin and Cubase is using the VST3 version. Why it is that VEP is more well behaved with Logic then it is with Cubase is anyone's guess. But here's the thing, when I look at the activity monitor, its VEP that is pegging into the 90's on my CPU.
Logic+VEP is literally taking half the CPU as compared to Cubase+VEP. When I run a test project with Cubase+VEP and compare it to exactly the same test project (100 midi tracks in the DAW feeding 100 channels of VSL instruments in VEP).
#Cubase 9 pro password macwins mac#
The CPU usage is a real thing, make no mistake, but i want to point out that there are some mac users happily using it and also, in my own experience its possible that the cpu problem you keep hearing about is actually isolated to Cubase+VEP, where the problem is actually in VEP. It still has some compelling features, despite the fact that it does seem to use a bit more CPU on the mac. Only buy cubase if you are committed to the idea of changing over to it, that's my advice.
#Cubase 9 pro password macwins upgrade#
The generous sale is interesting, but their routine upgrade prices are pricey so you will get drawn into more money sooner or later. Not trying to start a platform war, just curious about stability and performance! Thanks! FWIW the future of the Mac Pro may become much clearer in a few weeks at WWDC. I'm impressed that I even managed to get it set up, but I'm not sure how sustainable the Hackintosh will prove to be and I'd like to have a super stable and snappy Cubase DAW machine going forward.
#Cubase 9 pro password macwins windows#
From what I understand the performance gap between operating systems has closed for the most part, but I'm curious what others thoughts and experiences are on this matter with the latest versions of Cubase and the newest operating systems.Ĭubase 9.5 was very stable for me on Windows but I went down the Hackintosh route because I'm a bit happier overall in MacOS and I was using Pro Tools which is a nicer experience on the Mac. This has me wondering if Cubase still runs a bit better on Windows. I'm running into an odd issue that I asked about here. I'm getting Cubase 10 up and running on my MacOS Mojave Hackintosh after a detour into Pro Tools land.
0 kommentar(er)
